Handling Constrained Many-Objective Optimization Problems via Problem Transformation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objectives optimization and constraints satisfaction are two equally important goals to solve constrained many-objective problems (CMaOPs). However, most existing studies for CMaOPs can be classified as feasibility-driven-constrained evolutionary algorithms (CMaOEAs), they always give priority satisfy constraints, while ignoring the maintenance of population diversity dealing with conflicting objectives. Consequently, may pushed toward some locally feasible optimal or infeasible areas in high-dimensional objective space. To alleviate this issue, article presents a problem transformation technique, which transforms CMaOP into dynamic (DCMaOP) handling optimizing objectives simultaneously, help cross large discrete regions. The well-known reference-point-based NSGA-III is tailored under model CMaOPs, namely, DCNSGA-III. In article, $\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }$ -feasible solutions play an role proposed algorithm. end, DCNSGA-III, mating selection mechanism environmental operator designed generate choose high-quality offspring solutions, respectively. algorithm evaluated on series benchmark three, five, eight, ten, 15 compared against six state-of-the-art CMaOEAs. experimental results indicate that highly competitive solving CMaOPs.
منابع مشابه
solution of security constrained unit commitment problem by a new multi-objective optimization method
چکیده-پخش بار بهینه به عنوان یکی از ابزار زیر بنایی برای تحلیل سیستم های قدرت پیچیده ،برای مدت طولانی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است.پخش بار بهینه توابع هدف یک سیستم قدرت از جمله تابع هزینه سوخت ،آلودگی ،تلفات را بهینه می کند،و هم زمان قیود سیستم قدرت را نیز برآورده می کند.در کلی ترین حالتopf یک مساله بهینه سازی غیر خطی ،غیر محدب،مقیاس بزرگ،و ایستا می باشد که می تواند شامل متغیرهای کنترلی پیوسته و گ...
On Constraint Handling in Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms are often used to solve computationally expensive problems. But their efficacy on handling constrained optimization problems having more than three objectives has not been widely studied. Particularly the issue of how feasible and infeasible solutions are handled in generating a data set for training a surrogate has not rece...
متن کاملSubstitute Distance Assignments in NSGA-II for Handling Many-objective Optimization Problems
Many-objective optimization refers to optimization problems with a number of objectives considerably larger than two or three. In this paper, a study on the performance of the Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) for handling such many-objective optimization problems is presented. In its basic form, the algorithm is not well suited for the handling of a larger number o...
متن کاملDynamic-objective particle swarm optimization for constrained optimization problems
This paper firstly presents a novel constraint-handling technique , called dynamicobjective method (DOM), based on the search mechanism of the particles of particle swarm optimization (PSO). DOM converts the constrained optimization problem into a bi-objective optimization problem, and then enables each particle to dynamically adjust its objectives according to its current position in the searc...
متن کاملUsing Different Many-Objective Techniques in Particle Swarm Optimization for Many Objective Problems: An Empirical Study
Pareto based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms face several problems when dealing with a large number of objectives. In this situation, almost all solutions become nondominated and there is no pressure towards the Pareto Front. The use of Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO) in multi-objective problems grew in recent years. The PSO has been found very efficient in solve Multi-Objec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IEEE transactions on cybernetics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2168-2275', '2168-2267']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2020.3031642